Most conferences, conventions and seminars are based on contributions from various speakers. These authors from all over the world submit their abstracts, articles or presentations on the Web. Then, a program committee assigns reviewers (peers) to each contribution.
The reviewers prepare a recommendation for the committee, whether the contribution should be accepted for the conference.

A peer review as it is standard in academic communities does not only make the evaluation fair. It also guarantees for better quality because the program of a conference can maintain a certain professional level.
Electronic peer reviewing on the Internet very much speeds up the entire reviewing process. Usually, every contribution will be reviewed by at least two or three reviewers. So, the management of the assignments and distribution of documents to review, the collection of the review results, and finally the overall evaluation gets very complicated if adequate tools do not support it.

Peer reviewing also means that people read and recommend improvements and changes on each other's work.
Both the author and the reviewer benefit from the review process.
Peer reviewing is no longer a complex, tedious and inefficient process thanks to the Internet-based tools. Reviewers have permanent (24x7) access to the platform; a program chair or editor has always a real-time overview of the running status of all reviews.
Pre-defined mail templates allow an efficient communication for reminders and other comments.

Eveni provides a flexible, double-blind peer reviewing system to support the programming of your conference or competition, continuously improving the quality of your conferences.

                                              ...back to the Newsletter